Pearl Harbor Historian Views Concerning The Issue
Historians always agree on many occasions. The incident occurring at Pearl Harbor raised varied opinions and thoughts. This is occurrence that happened when Japan attacked the American naval base in Hawaii during the World War 2. These made America to revenge. Many questions were raised by the citizens on the issue. They included: whether the U. S. Knew of the attack, was it unprovoked, as well as whether it was deliberate so as to trigger Japan and engage the two in nations into a war. Among the first to question the initial story was Pearl Harbor historian Beard.
Beard in his book maintained that America made a deliberate move on Japan and this left them with no alternative but to attack. This deliberate move was when the United States cut off the access of raw materials by Japan. These materials were much needed by Japan in its military adventure. In any way, they had to strike to get them despite risking the possibility of a war emerging. More so, the government must have known of the outbreak in advance.
Thomas Fleming in his book argues that President Roosevelt deliberately and deceitfully forced America into war with Japan. Basil Rauch in his book refuted the argument by Beard, saying that America did not know of any attack in advance. It however knew that there would be an attack somewhere. America though had made some efforts to challenge Japan to take the first shot.
More varying views came from Richard N. Current concerning the attack. In his book, it is true that Stimson had anticipated a possible attack though not in America. An attack would be launched in the Pacific where possessions of the Dutch and Britain belonged.
He alleged that Stimson never intended to maneuver Japan to launch this attack. He wanted Japan to attack the possessions by Dutch or Britain which would look like an attack on America. This would arouse the Congress to assign a war declaration.
Roberta Wohlstetter came up with a different approach on this issue. She did not care to answer whether United States wanted the attacks or not. She undertook the question regarding the knowledge of the government on this attack. She concluded that United States had enough warning about the intensions by Japan and should have seen the possibility of attack. The government however failed to interpret this evidence correctly.
Admiral Edwin raised a concern about the intelligence of United States about this issue in his memoir. There was also an allegation from Gordon W. Prange that the administration of U. S. Made mistakes in making wrong interpretation of the intentions of Japan. He however did not agree that Roosevelt was deliberate in forcing a war with Japan.
Finally, claims still continued years after the incident. John Toland argued in his book that the navy new of the attacks after new evidence emerged. He concluded the president must have known the possibility of the outbreak. Roosevelt however allowed it hoping that it would arouse the United States. Toland like the other writers was not able to give any evidence.
Beard in his book maintained that America made a deliberate move on Japan and this left them with no alternative but to attack. This deliberate move was when the United States cut off the access of raw materials by Japan. These materials were much needed by Japan in its military adventure. In any way, they had to strike to get them despite risking the possibility of a war emerging. More so, the government must have known of the outbreak in advance.
Thomas Fleming in his book argues that President Roosevelt deliberately and deceitfully forced America into war with Japan. Basil Rauch in his book refuted the argument by Beard, saying that America did not know of any attack in advance. It however knew that there would be an attack somewhere. America though had made some efforts to challenge Japan to take the first shot.
More varying views came from Richard N. Current concerning the attack. In his book, it is true that Stimson had anticipated a possible attack though not in America. An attack would be launched in the Pacific where possessions of the Dutch and Britain belonged.
He alleged that Stimson never intended to maneuver Japan to launch this attack. He wanted Japan to attack the possessions by Dutch or Britain which would look like an attack on America. This would arouse the Congress to assign a war declaration.
Roberta Wohlstetter came up with a different approach on this issue. She did not care to answer whether United States wanted the attacks or not. She undertook the question regarding the knowledge of the government on this attack. She concluded that United States had enough warning about the intensions by Japan and should have seen the possibility of attack. The government however failed to interpret this evidence correctly.
Admiral Edwin raised a concern about the intelligence of United States about this issue in his memoir. There was also an allegation from Gordon W. Prange that the administration of U. S. Made mistakes in making wrong interpretation of the intentions of Japan. He however did not agree that Roosevelt was deliberate in forcing a war with Japan.
Finally, claims still continued years after the incident. John Toland argued in his book that the navy new of the attacks after new evidence emerged. He concluded the president must have known the possibility of the outbreak. Roosevelt however allowed it hoping that it would arouse the United States. Toland like the other writers was not able to give any evidence.
About the Author:
You can visit www.pearlharborchild.com for more helpful information about Pearl Harbor Historian Views Concerning The Issue.
Comments
Post a Comment